Document: Minutes|Case|Willem de Marschalck v. Dirck Looten and Arien Appel: demand for depositions about the barrel of brandy bought in company: evidence provided: oath offered: judgment that loss or leakage needs to be shared

Minutes|Case|Willem de Marschalck v. Dirck Looten and Arien Appel: demand for depositions about the barrel of brandy bought in company: evidence provided: oath offered: judgment that loss or leakage needs to be shared|Minutes|Case|Hendrick Hendrickzen Obe v. Eghbert Meindersen: demand for payment of debt according to account: denied and counter-claim: referred to arbitrators|Minutes|Case|Curators of the estate of Sicx van der Stighelen v. Samuel Etsal: default: demand for payment of debt in tobacco for goods received: denied: proof required: arrest valid